Should City Hall push ahead with plans for Bally's casino in River West? Here's what Sun-Times readers say.

With Mayor Brandon Johnson and a gaming expert Bally’s will meet its state-mandated September 2026 deadline for the $1.7 billion casino it’s planning in River West, we asked readers whether the city of Chicago should push forward with Bally’s plans to build a permanent casino there. Here’s what you told us, the responses lightly edited for clarity and readability:“The city of Chicago and Mayor Johnson need to hold Bally’s to the original agreement without revisions. Our police and fire pension funds are depending on the revenue.”— “The current [temporary Medinah Temple] location is perfect. Centrally located, easily accessible for tourists and residents, great re-adaptive use of a historic building.”— “Just use a floor or two of Sears Tower for a nighttime casino with restaurants. The city lights at night will be beautiful. Will be a fun destination even for those not that into casinos. Some people might be into the view and the dining and still might gamble a little.”— “No. That area is congested enough without a casino on that corner.”— “Absolutely! Employment and higher tourism, which, of course, is tax revenue and money for local businesses. And where else in the Midwest is prettiest for a backdrop? ❤️❤️❤️"— “No, there is no longer any need. The temporary one proves people are afraid to go to a casino in Chicago.”— Why not? Keeps people from creeping across the bridge to Indiana.”— “It’s hard to believe that they still don’t have one after 30 years of legalized gambling.”— “How about they build a HUGE affordable housing complex instead? That’d be a win/win in my book!”—