Loading
What do Sam AltmanAIAITRACVCTRACTRACTRACVCTRACVCTRACTRACVCTRACTRACVCAI TRACAI AIYour browser does not support the element. and David Sacks have in common? Certainly not politics. Mr Altman, co-founder of Open, is part of the transition team of Daniel Lurie, the Democratic mayor-elect of San Francisco. David Sacks, an entrepreneur and , will on January 20th become Donald Trump’s crypto and artificial-intelligence () tsar. Yet both have the distinction of being among Silicon Valley’s best spotters of entrepreneurial talent. According to data from , a venture-capital () firm, few are as good at picking promising startups at the very earliest stage.Messrs Altman and Sacks stand out because of the whopping number of successful startups they have backed right from the beginning, when most investment tends to come from a founder’s friends and family. reckons that 28% of Mr Altman’s 322 early-stage investments have made at least ten times the original stake, and 27 have become unicorns, with valuations over $1bn. Mr Sacks’ hit rate is just as good. Of his 92 bets monitored by , 27% have produced more than ten-fold returns, and 17 have become unicorns.The two men are among the best of an elite group of 250 or so early-stage investors who, according to , generate supersized returns. The list features a number of other well-known names, including Elon Musk, boss of Tesla and SpaceX; Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon; and Marc Andreessen of Andreessen Horowitz, a giant. Jessica Livingston, co-founder of Y Combinator, a venture firm, is one of the dozen or so female early-stage investors among the 250 (the small number reflects the underrepresentation of women in Silicon Valley generally). Though she has made only 13 early-stage investments, 31% of them have made a return of more than ten times.’s methodology is novel. Whereas most firms use gut instinct and inside knowledge to spot the most promising entrepreneurs, it uses a range of quantitative metrics to identify the most consistent talent scouts instead. That includes the multiple they return on their investments, assuming their stakes could be liquidated at current values, and the share of their portfolios that do follow-on fundraisings. If two or more of them back a startup in a field where they have a proven record, that is a strong predictor that the startup will be worth backing, says. Its modus operandi is to invest alongside them if it can.At first glance, some of the superstars on ’s list look like one-hit wonders. Sara Deshpande of Maven Ventures, a firm, has generated very high returns mostly from a single company, Embark Trucks, a self-driving outfit that later went bust. But ’s data suggest she has done well in steering many of her startups to the next funding round. does not oversell itself. “I’m a nobody in ,” said Joe Aaron, its co-founder, when first contacted by your correspondent. The firm uses a variety of information sources, but the data are patchy, he admits. It’s a small fund. One of its early investments, a fintech company called Human Interest, became a unicorn in 2021. But the fund sometimes struggles to make investments owing to competition with better-known firms that are able to write bigger cheques.The surge of investment into may open up new opportunities. has already identified two names it believes are worth following, even if they do invest as a pair. They are Nat Friedman and Daniel Gross, two Silicon Valley investors known for their expertise. “I see them in almost every company I look up,” says Mr Aaron. One day their names could be up there with Messrs Altman and Sacks.
