The IMF is growing more picky about who it funds

MANY AFRICANSIMFIMFIMFIMF still harbour a grudge against the that dates back to the 1990s, when it became known for the bitter medicine it administered. Before any bail-outs, the fund would insist that countries agree to painful structural-adjustment programmes that included cutting government spending and liberalising economies. Since then the has worked hard to present itself as a cuddlier lender than the cold-hearted fund of old. These days it attaches far fewer conditions to loans and sometimes overlooks even those.Yet recent events in west and central Africa suggest it is being forced to find some of its old mettle, at least in private, as it tries to balance the sometimes competing goals of getting emergency pandemic money out quickly while also fighting corruption. Take oil-rich Equatorial Guinea, a family-run kleptocracy that struck a three-year $283m bail-out agreement with the in 2019. Although the fund handed over some cash immediately, it has since rather quietly stopped signing cheques. An spokesman blamed covid-19 and an explosion at an army base for the country’s slow pace of reform. The programme, which is due to expire next year, looks set to follow the fate of one in nearby Congo-Brazzaville.